Mastering specialisms: The benefits of a focused qualification

With so many changes on the horizon in legal qualifications, it’s no surprise that the courses themselves are going to undertake dramatic changes too. Here at The University of Law, we are always working to ensure our course offerings meet the demands of both students and employers, which is why we have recently launched a wide selection of new Master’s specialism courses. To find out more about these courses, we sat down with National Programme and Student Affairs Director Dr Leyanda Purchase.

At Master’s level, students want the ability to specialise and perfect their skills in particular areas. What’s especially important is the opportunity to have choices in terms of the modules to study. As law schools try to include SQE preparation content as part of their standard undergraduate programmes, they have to sacrifice some of the customisability that was previously there. That’s why we set out to design a series of courses that help to make our students more specialist and therefore more employable on graduation.

We chose to focus on areas that we, as an institution, have the expertise to really help students understand how the law is applied in practice. Our new suite of Master’s courses can be broadly broken down into five main categories: corporate, legal tech, human rights, medical, and dispute resolution. We’re well-known for our expertise in corporate law, so we were keen to build on this experience by offering a number of focused programmes within this area. These delve into specialist areas such as Company Law and Corporate Governance.

We wanted to stay true to ULaw’s core ethos of providing legal training with a practical application. We’ve therefore focused all our Master’s specialisms on applied academic study. This means that we will still consider the core theoretical debates in a given subject area, but we’ll also put that theory into a practical context. We’ve made these courses complementary to our existing offering to ensure that while we’re catering to growing demand, we’re also keeping our main focus on providing a solid practical education in areas where our tutors’ expert knowledge and practical experience makes the difference to our students.

Of all the new course areas, I’m most excited about the exploration of legal tech. The University of Law is leading the way when it comes to studying legal technology. We’ve already embedded legal tech into our LPC and are soon going to be launching new MSc and PG Dip Legal Technology courses at our London Moorgate, Leeds and Nottingham campuses. These three campuses will also be our legal tech hubs, working together to foster a community committed to delivering programmes at the forefront of the discipline. This is a new and exciting area of the law, which will no doubt present us with many fascinating advancements in the coming decade.

We aim to continually expand and develop our postgraduate legal programmes to meet the needs of the sector. In particular, I think we will see growth in hybrid academic-professional Master’s awards as the sector adjusts to the introduction of the SQE and students look to specialise beyond their undergraduate degree. With increasing levels of automation within law firms, solicitors at every level are being freed up to concentrate on value added tasks; tasks which require more technical, specialised knowledge. I therefore think that we will see more demand for qualified practitioners who have upskilled in areas that are important to their firms. It’s this kind of expertise that is going to really boost career progression in the future. Needless to say, legal technology is going to be the key area to complement further automation, so I think we will see an increased range of shorter Master’s level programmes such as the Postgraduate Certificate (PG Cert) and Postgraduate Diploma (PG Dip).

These new courses fall largely outside of the scope of the SQE and Future Bar Training. At ULaw we offer two different types of Master’s programme: taught academic and taught professional courses; our new Master’s courses are taught academic. The expectation is that taught academic Master’s courses will continue to exist as they always have, possibly with an emergence of a hybrid taught academic-professional programme to cover any possible legal training gaps brought about by the SQE. What we’re finding from the majority of law firms we’ve spoken with is a concern that the SQE won’t cover important elective content currently covered by the LPC. Firms want our students to continue to receive training in these important areas of legal practice, so it’s likely that those current LPC elective subject areas will become Master’s programmes of the future. This will allow for a focused and specialised knowledge in key areas, while our professional courses will continue to prepare students for qualification.

I think the future will see the majority of students completing an undergraduate degree and a Master’s qualification in addition to the SQE. For students wanting to specialise in a particular area of law, it will only be through a Master’s award that this specialism is likely to be achievable. Becoming a legal professional is hugely competitive and students are constantly trying to ensure they stand out from the crowd. With the standardisation of assessment brought in by the SQE, it’s going to be through specialised Master’s qualifications that students will be able to demonstrate how they are different and suitable for the careers they aspire to fulfil.

To find out more about our specialist Master’s programmes, visit our website.

Other articles that may interest you

UNDERSTANDING THE SQE AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR ME

Last year the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced their decision to reform solicitor qualification in England and Wales by introducing the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE). The SRA have been consulting on reforms since 2015, and their proposals have been controversial with firms and universities alike. Now that they’ve decided how they want to proceed, students looking to qualify as a solicitor are asking about what the changes might mean. 

Is social media the new law specialism?

The first recorded use of the phrase “social media” by an English court was by the Lord Chief Justice, who was responding to an appeal by two men convicted of stirring up some of the 2011 London riots via Facebook.