Law and order in the Metaverse: legal expert warns how you could be at risk. Find out more
Conflict in Israel and Gaza – support for students. Find out more


Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) consultation on the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE)

Professor Andrea Nollent, Vice-Chancellor & CEO at The University of Law, comments on the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) consultation on the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) which closes on Monday, 9 January:

“We do think there are positive reasons for a centralised system of examination, particularly to achieve consistency. Although we don’t oppose the concept of centralised examinations, we disagree that the proposed SQE will be a robust and effective measure of competence. We welcome the desirability of widening participation in the profession, but we don’t believe that these proposals, as they stand will, achieve these collective aims.

“We agree that, as with other professions, law should be a graduate profession but the SQE will be too superficial in stage 1 and too narrow and restricted in stage 2, to properly assess the competence needed for trainee or qualified solicitors to safely act for the public. In particular, the loss of elective subjects means that the level of understanding of key practice areas will inevitably be lower under the SQE regime than the current one. Firms will find their trainees will not have the subject knowledge of the area they are working on, nor the same level of skills in applying knowledge to practice areas that current trainees have. We anticipate that many law firms will require additional courses to be undertaken before the period of work-based learning commences to make up for the competence gap. These courses will add to the cost of training, and potentially end up costing students more than the current LPC.

“In addition, we are concerned the proposed SQE may not develop or test the full range of intellectual skills needed to practise law. This may mean students are less equipped for practice than they are under the current pathways to qualification. The SRA proposals may also impact negatively on diversity, with firms reverting to recruiting trainees from tried and tested backgrounds.

“We appreciate that there is always scope to improve quality and raise standards, but we don’t feel the SQE as currently proposed will achieve this. We will continue to engage with the SRA and other relevant parties to explore how best to advance the training, assessment, and qualification process for the profession.”

The University of Law has submitted a formal response to the SRA in response to its consultation on the proposed introduction of the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE), the full copy can be found here.